This poll was created on Facebook, please ask the poll owner to allow voting on the public page here.
Give others the chance to vote.
Share this poll, because the more votes the better.
Create your own.
Opinions! We all have them. Find out what people really think with polls and surveys from Crowdsignal.
big N O
maganda ang gun ban, sa mga tulad nilang meron mga personal guards,dapat sila ang maging huwaran ng pamarisan ng marami.kailangan walang exemptions dapat lahat pati mga pulitiko walang guns at personal guards. d pantay kung tayo lang mga responsible gun owners ang sakop ng gun ban.
dpat ipatupad ung gun ban kso npkhrap iptupad nun dhil hnd kontrolado ng gobyerno ang mga mamamayan na may mg baril kea mahirap
pero wlang mhrap sa mamamayang
HONEST
and
DISCIPLINED
I dont think na magbabago na ang pinas. im sorry to say but its the ugly truth. only god can help us now. god bless us all.
I have a question lang po. puwede bang magkaroon ng guns ang mga us citizen? we need them lalo di ba? thanks po. sana wag naman i-ban ang guns. we need to be able to defend ourselves. di natin maasahan lagi ang mga polis.
yes provided that every individual shall be protected and be given assurance of their lives against criminals. baguhin n ntin ang ratio of number of police/individual 1police is to 1civilian. can you promise us PNP? khit di na kami mgddla ng sariling weapon. cguro nman secured n kami pag gnun
walang criminal ang magddla ng legally issued n baril means tagilid ang mga my mga legal issued weapon. pano mapprotektahan ang sarili sa mssmang loob na my hawak na clorum weapon? mkakatulong ang cibilyan sa PNP kung papayagan cla mgdla ng armas sa labas. dahil hindi nmn kaya ng PNP na protektahan ang lahat lalo n sa gabi, it must have an exemption, retired PNP at mga bsnessmens member of the bar as well must be permitted to carry firearm outside.
if only I can vote 80 million times for all Filipinos under the mercy of criminal elements and helpless cops........
NO. Hindi solution ang gun-ban. Dapat improve yung police visibility at foot patrols pati random check-points. Hindi problema ang mga yan sa mga responsible gun owners, problema yan sa mga criminal. Kaso ang mga otoridad, tamad, halimbawa, imbes na piliin lang ang bulok sa basket ng itlog, itapon na lang lahat pati basket.Ayaw nila ng ganun kasi walang kotong dun. Malapit pa sila sa reklamo.
NO!!!!! Matutuwa mga kriminal nyan!!! Lalo silang walang takot na mangharas o mangulo o mang rape kaya!!! Kalokohan yang gunban! Pabor sa mga kriminal!
Hahaha u foolish people! DEFINITELY NO!!!!!!
Kung gusto nyo mamatay wag kayo magdala ng baril. NO...NO...NO TO GUNBAN!
A big NO!!!
stupid that permanent gunban advocate!! damn you!! ano akala nyo sa mga saril nyo hndi tinatablan ng bala??? mga ignorante kc kyo sa sports nmin!!! burglar at home envation proof b kyong mga imbecile kyo!!!!!!! p@tan@ in$ nyo!!! mga makikitib ang brains!!!
A big no!
Permanent Gunban? Ano sila hilo? eh di natuwa ang mga masasamang loob niyan.
Mahal ko pamilya ko, mahal ko sarili ko, mahal ko ang aking mga kababayan, GALIT AKO SA KRIMINAL kaya NO TO PERMANENT GUN BAN.
NO WAY TO PERMANENT GUNBAN MGA ILIGALISTA LANG ME GUSTO NIYAN.............. tinambakan na natin ang mga YES............
NO.... kung gusto nila ng GUN BAN unahin nilang dis-armahan lahat ng pulitiko sa Pilipinas.. tingnan natin kung di ba tayo magkagulo...
ang mga anti gun ay nagpapantasya lamang,sa panahon ngayon hindi ka na puwedeng maglakad sa kalye ng walang pangamba sa buhay mo,takot kang makasalubong ng mga BG takot ka ring makasalubong mga pulis dahil hindi na natin alam ang pagkakaiba ng BG at pulis,yung mga anti gun inaanyayahan kong pumunta sa mga magugulong lugar dito sa Maynila lalong lalo ka na pacheco,baka ni hindi ka makababa sa kotse mo.
a gunless society is just a myth! controlling or banning gun ownership just affects the legit gun owners. the police or even the gov't cannot control the proliferation of unlicensed firearms whch are usually owned by bad guys. Verzosa and Pacheco are in favor of gun ban bec they can afford bodyguards to protect them. magpakatotoo at magpakalalake kayo!!!
Absolutely NO!!!
NO to a "PERMANENT GUN BAN"..leo's are great, but when seconds count they are just minutes away....that's the reality.YES to a "CRIME FREE SOCIETY"..A FREE MAN OUGHT TO BE ARMED LEGALLY...
pag wala ng bad guys, snatcher, holdaper, kidnapper, carnapper, drug lords, at kung malinis na ang mindanao na di makontrol ng gubyerno natin at ilang malalayong lugar probinsya tulad ng norte ..... pwede na siguro totally gun ban,,,pero dito satin sa pinas na kahit saang sulok ka pumunta at anumang oras kahit sa loob na ng sarili mong bahay ay pinapasok kapa .... NO! to gun ban
YES! to double tap para sa Bad Guys!
A biggggg noooooooooo!!!
If you ban legal gun ownership by responsible family men and women who only wish to protect their lives and their families, you take away a fundamental human right to self preservation. You then become anti-human life.
A gunless society?
Yes, if and when….
•All goons are gone.
•Law and order are in order.
•Justice is just.
•Leftists, rightists, centrists have turned pacifists.
•Self-righteous men no longer kill in God’s name.
If not, ‘sorry the more I need a gun to help improve my chances of survival.
Huhu! Offcourse a BIG NO to gun ban!
Corrupt government official ban ang dapat!
Killing Ban, Holdup Ban, Stealing Ban, Drug Ban yan ang dapat. Yes sa Responsible Gun Ownership for Self Preservation
So it's NO to GUN BAN and YES to CRIME BAN...
I will not put the safety of my life in the hands of our law enforcement since the available officer are not enough to protect the civilian againts lawless criminal but with a license gun in my possession, I can do something to protect my family and my property...
hehehehe....NO TO GUN BAN....bakit mga pulis nga ngayon kulang sa baril at mahirap umasa sa kanila...walang pang gas minsan singilin ka pa pag rumesponde....yung gusto ng GUN BAN remember walang EUTOPIA rito sa lupa....pede yan kung patas ang laban...
yes to responsible gun ownership... no to paltiks and unlicensed firearms.
yes! kung uunahin muna nila malinis ang mindanao (gun free) then gawin nila sa buong pinas na.
Hell, No!
defenitely NO!!!
no to gun ban.......
NO!!! I never trust our law enforcers. Unless they improve their efficiency in preventing and solving crimes, I'll be forever carry my firearm to safeguard my love ones. Sometimes these law enforcers that supposed to be our protectors and defenders are the perpetrators of heinous crime.
a big NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
I would vote yes if our police forces were effective and efficient. Let's face it, our police aren't there to prevent crime, they're just there to pick up the pieces!
Imagine, one acquaintance said he tried calling the police once when he saw several men climbing a neighbor's yard and the person who answered the call said it wasn't his jurisdiction!!
NOOOOOOOO!!!!!! TO TOTAL GUN BAN.. IF GUNS ARE OUTLAWED ONLY CRIMINALS HAVE GUNS...Paano pa makalaban ang mga civilians sa mga criminal at sa mga corrupt na pulis...
permanent gunban only applies to those who follow the law
A permanent gun ban??? Crazy idea!!! How else do we protect ourselves from those illegal gun owners?
Guns made us free and have kept us free, one side says; the other side rejects guns as instruments of domination, lawlessness, and terrorism. The conflict rages on because both sides are right..gun is not an argument. its how we implement the laws.......... mga pulis nababasa nyu ba ito ha!... now yer trying to pull the trigger towards lawful people who are responsible enough to carry guns???
Perhaps the greatest obstacle to acquiring an understanding of the facts surrounding the gun
control debate is the firm conviction of many on both sides that most of the critical facts are self-evident. Is it not indisputable that the availability of guns increases the homicide rate and plays a large role in the philippines ( riding in tandem and guns for hire) high violence rates? How could the possession and use of deadly weapons NOT raise the murder rate? Alternatively, is it not obvious that widespread private gun ownership deters crime? The debaters begin with premises that are so thoroughly taken for granted that they never consider evaluating them.
Guns made us free and have kept us free, one side says; the other side rejects guns as instruments of domination, lawlessness, and terrorism. The conflict rages on because both sides are right..gun is not an argument. its how we implement the laws.......... mga pulis nababasa nyu ba ito ha!... now yer trying to pull the trigger towards lawful people who are responsible enough to carry guns???
Perhaps the greatest obstacle to acquiring an understanding of the facts surrounding the gun
control debate is the firm conviction of many on both sides that most of the critical facts are self-evident. Is it not indisputable that the availability of guns increases the homicide rate and plays a large role in the philippines ( riding in tandem and guns for hire) high violence rates? How could the possession and use of deadly weapons NOT raise the murder rate? Alternatively, is it not obvious that widespread private gun ownership deters crime? The debaters begin with premises that are so thoroughly taken for granted that they never consider evaluating them.
nonononononononoonononononononono to gun ban...............
absolutely no to total gun ban...we need to protect ourselves against bad elements outside our premises...walang pulis na pwedeng magtanggol sa mamamayan 24 hours a day..ang buhay namin at ng pamilya namin ang pinakaimportante..
Big NO to permanent GunBan.
Its a case to case basis. If there's really a necessity for an individual to carry a gun then he may do so provided that he complies with all the requisites needed to secure a firearm. The standards must be high for all those applying for a license and the strictest of standards must be implemented to weed out all those irresponsible individuals who does not know how to manage their firearms and leave those individuals who need protection and who's lives are at risk if they don't secure one.
A big no!
mas may tiwala ako sa baril ko kaysa sa mga pulis!
NO TO GUN BAN! Pag may crimen wala naman ang pulis o kung dumating man napatay kana. Madalas pulis pa mga pusakal.
gun ban is only applicable sa legally law abiding citizens not to carnappers, holduppers, private armies, gun for hire, and other criminal elements couldn't care less in fact mas magiging armed to the teeth pa sila. saka would this also mean that inutil ang government in keeping the peace and security ng bansa kung ganito?
total gun ban = only law enforcement officers and CRIMINALS will carry fire arms?????????????????????
Tsaka na pag yung mga nagtutulak ng total gun ban can travel without their security escorts. Gusto lang ng Philiansa National Police ng additional fees for FA docs and licenses. Baka may balak ulit mag-tour sa europe ng mga heneral.
yes brothers no to "TOTAL GUN BAN"
NO to total GUN BAN! PERIOD!
No to "TOTAL GUN BAN!" yes to "NO CRIME ZONE!"
No to total gun ban... they should regulate it instead.
No to permanent gun ban!!!
Cancelled nga ang extension ng Gun Ban baka dagdagan naman ang exhorbitant fees sa PNP-FED.
Ask your self: do you really want the cops and the military to have the monopoly on the use and ownership of guns in this country? Do you even trust them? Do you realize that incidence of theft will increase once guns are banned? The UK has this very problem today due to strict gun laws yet Texas, New Hampshire and Arizona doesn't because they have strong pro-gun laws. It is a question of freedom.
NO!!!! JUST LOOK ON THE STATISTICS, FAs involved in crimes are unlicensed "WHEN GUNS ARE OUTLAWED, ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE GUNS ,,,,
some civilians carry guns in public because it’s a status symbol, but then it’s the fault of the PNP that these irresponsible people were given permits and even licenses.
And the PNP now blames us, who are responsible licensed gun owners, for its mistake and ineptitude?
During Sen. Ping Lacson’s watch at the PNP and PAOCTF, civilians were disallowed to carry guns outside their homes.
Why? Because the rogues at the PNP and PAOCTF didn’t want their civilian victims to fight back.
We must remember that the guys who abducted and killed publicist Bubby Dacer and driver Emmanuel Corbito were from the PAOCTF.
Rogue regimes, such as that of Erap’s, don’t allow civilians to own guns because an unarmed citizenry is easy to control and cow.
-mon tulfo, http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/metro/view/20100604-273846/Officials-in-high-stakes-gambling
mostly yong may license ang mga baril 'own by the working professionals_!
so bakit tayo ang pag initan ,government shall focus on sa mga organized crime organization..
pacheco et al SUCKS!
The PNP blindsided the REAL PRO_GUN organization in their Sarsuela/Moro-Moro Gun Summit. Not an unheard of tactic and capability of the PNP. You get invited to a game, you play fair yet you wonder why you can't win. It's because such game was fixed before you even got there. nice one score na naman si General Verso...za. Sip-sip na Kopal pa. No to gun ban.
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms, disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve to encourage rather than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson
to the GMANews.TV, we are thanking you for making this poll...i hope you out there could also say your opinions on this matter...
I'm posting this to let everybody know how this people treated us legit owners of real steel or even airsoft guns...they are making fun of us...
A walkout by PROGUN marred today the PNP Gun Summit 2010. Initially, PROGUN was not given a slot as speaker in the "insights" portion of the Summit wherein our Opposing party, the Gunless Society was allowed to give a lengthy speech through Nandy Pacheco. Instead, the PNP assigned Mr. Christopher "Pery" Punla to speak as leader of an organization called, "Total Pro-Gun Confederation". This organization has not even been organized yet and Mr. Punla re-appeared on the gun scene only a week ago stating that he was organizing GENCOP.
Claiming to be Progun, Punla gave a satirical speech which appeared to favor gun ownership, but in reality it was a comic act critical of gun owners and showing that we were unstable gun nuts. He claimed that he wanted to push for the right to openly carry assault rifles and mount them on gun owners cars, and roofs of houses. He likewise spoke in favor of the right to own and carry publicly crew-served weapons such as belt-fed machine guns and bomb launchers. Expectedly, the crowd began laughing at what appeared to be a clown giving a stand up comedy routine. Since we felt that this type of talk sent the wrong signal to the public that legitimate gun owners were irresponsible, and that Punla was using our name Progun (without authorization) for purposes making fun of gun owners, the PROGUN contingent decided to walk out of the Summit hall at mid-day.
We were also wondering why this unorganized 1 week old organization was given a speaking slot at the Summit, and whether or not this was planned deliberately using a planted trojan horse as a smoke screen to the anti-gun ban efforts of PROGUN.
The name PROGUN is a registered trademark in the Intellectual Property Office (IPO). Due to Punla's unlawful use of our PROGUN trademark in a manner which discredits and disgraces gun owners, we disavow everything that Punla said or will say, using the name "progun". He is likewise sternly warned that publicly using a registered trademark without license or authority from the registered owner constitutes infringement of a trademark which is a criminal offense. This is especially so, if the trademark is used in a confusingly similar manner which damages the goodwill and reputation of the registered owner.
We were hoping that the Summit would provide a venue for serious discussion on gun issues which have become of public interest. Chief jesus Verzosa and a number of top PNP Brass were present, thus giving an opportunity for a serious dialogue. However, the most vocal stakeholders and groups were never even allowed to speak and/or participate in the discussions, and the whole proceedings turned out to be on big expensive anti-gun press release.
Last year, PROGUN was the cluster head and presenter of Cluster "D" of the Summit. This year, although we noted that the event was not as well organized and participants were about half of those who attended last year, we endeavored in good faith to participate in what we expected to be a bona fide gun issues discussion. Instead, we were gravely disappointed.
Syempre no,kahit mga pulis ngayon dapat depensahan natin sarili natin,at madami akong napapanood sa television na nanutok at nagpaputok.Ano ito?Martial Law.
sa japan walAng baril mga tao dun dahil lahat ng mga tao dun kumakain ng higit sa tatlong beses isang araw at may pinansyal na tulong silang natatangap mula sa gobyerno. hindi tulad dito sa bansa natin maraming taong napipilitang gumwa ng msama dahil kumakalam ang sikmura ng kanilang pamilya. cinagot ko lang po ung post nila sa dyaryo
NapakarAming loose firearms, isa pa d lhat ng mga nka unipormeng may baril matino madaming abusado. pano pa ung mga masasamang loob.!!! no to permanent gunban
kung hindi naimbento ang firearms at kumalat sa populasyon sige total gun ban. pero common sense lang yan. di nyo nga mahuli yung mga perps na may baril at wala ring police support na 24/7 at ang police visibility ay ilang lugar lang may period pa. kung yung mga nagsasabing permanent gun ban ay lalabas sa kalye ng walang bodyguards, sige. kaso never yon. kaya NO to gun ban. wag na tayo maglokohan sa idea ng gun ban
Its just a reminder... pero dapat gamitin lang sa tama at hindi sa masama...
No !!
Do we have to be a rocket scientists to figure out that criminals do not obey gun bans?
The PNP has this illusion that crimes went down because of the gun ban. Assuming that the crime did go down (and I'm not acceeding that it did), are they telling me that the CPNP is so charismatic that by merely announcing the gun ban on national TV and print, the criminals suddenly said "oh no, I can't carry my firearms anymore and commit crimes because I'm such a law-abiding criminal."?
A big no......
this gun ban forever doesn't make any sense!
criminals uses loose firearms total gun ban only affects licensed gun owners who are you picking? unless you are criminal too!!!
Nooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!
no no no.... no way they are gonna deprive us of our right.
A big no to permanent gun ban !!!
This is a big no.. Gun ban only affects legitimate and responsible gun owners, can the Law Enforcement Agencies totally disarm criminals? The answer is another big NO.. Those caught violating the current gun ban are police and military personnels who are said to be off duty, some are airsofters, Now let's ask General Versoza what percent of these caught gunban violaters are the real criminals? Do criminals follow your gun ban? Does your gunban really solved problems on illegal firearms?
we have a right to bear arms , protect our selves, family and property.....
as a said on my previous comment POLICE visibility is D much effective way in preventing crimes not GUN BAN
Bakit kaya ba ng PNP pigilin ang mga kriminal lalo lang sila magkakaroon ng lakas ng loob gumawa ng marami pang krimen
Boom corrupt corrupt....boom corrupt corrupt...
kurakot kurakot boom boom boom
itong gun ban ay pinauso nila para ang mga pulitiko na nagaagawan sa pwesto ay medyo mabawasan ang pagpapatayan....na kapag naupo naman sa pwesto ay wala naman tayong nagiging pakinabang...katakottakot na bodyguards na kapag dumadaan sa highway ay katakottakot na sirena at hawi sa atin para mabilis sila makaraan patungo sa wala namang saysay na patutunguhan....lahat sila armado ng matataas na kalibreng baril na hindi mo na mabilang!!!!!
ngayon, bakit hindi sila ang dis-armahan ng pamahalaan?
Bakit tayo na nangangailangan ng panangga laban sa mga tulad nila at masasamang elemento?
GUN THE BAN......
A BIG NO!!! and a VERY SOUNDING NO!!!
they always say na bumaba ang crime rate due to gunban this election period, yes indeed bumaba SIGURO, pero not because of the gunban chief, but because of the checkpoints at almost every corners, but don't you ever think that when the gunban started, most of the uniformed mens get captured, why this is because they carry such TO PROTECT THEMSELVES, because they know that they are very vulnerable to an individual who were angry to them, no criminal follows this ruling (gunban)...nabaon na sa limot ang isang madre na HINOLDAP during the gunban period, ang masaklap, pinatay pa nila ang madre...im not saying that this nun must carry a ahndgun to protect herself, but can't you see, that devil citizen was carrying a gun, GUNBAN pa...maghihintay pa ba tayo na may mamatay uli na isang law abiding citizan bago tayo mamulat...don't say police are out there to protect us, dahil ang mga mobile ay walang enough gas allocation to roam around and check the city...
A BIG NOOOOOO
Total Gun Ban is not the solution, Solution LEO should start work serriously in their job...
When did criminals start obeying the gun laws? Why does anyone still think disarming the honest citizens of a country favors anyone other criminals and thugs? Where has this EVER worked? Where has crime decreased and the law abiding citizen been safer after guns were taken from citizens?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
My guns are all legal, we have the right to defend ourselves, on the spot againts BGs, mahirap umasa sa kapulisan, tapos na ang situation bago sila dumating!
we do not have enough policemen to fully protect us. even they themselves have been victimized by crime!... just a few hours ago, the brother of BSP Governor Tetangco was shot dead along with 2 individuals inside a ford expedition, where were the police when this happened?
NO to permanent gun ban!
Hey Mr. Versoza, i'm paying my guns renewal responsibly. Don't be a sucker!
Do your part, be fair on your decision Cheap!
PS:
The other day this PNP gen in an interview, told the media that since the election gun ban was implemented, there was a definite drop in the country's crime rate. Really now. Hmmm.... Then how is it that in that same tv news, was feature the killing of a retired colonel and several others were wounded in bacoor cavite. shot by members of that municipality's police in broad day light, on a busy road. Another was an incident in lanao, comelec declared a failure of elections, when on may 10, a shoot out between supporters of opposing candidates erupted in a polling stn.
May be this general was right. There was a drop in "REPORTED" crime, cause the criminals were busy killing retired colonels or killing each other. After all, kanino ka magsusumbong kung walang tao sa police stn kasi abala sa masamang gawain.
General PULIS PATOLA! gumusing ka!
check out new york city's crime rate. they have one of the most restrictive anti gun laws in the us. now check with finland, norway, canada, israel. these places not onli permit gun ownership, but some actually issues their peoples assault rifles. what do you think their crime rate is compared to new york?
let put it this way; CITIZEN + GUN = DEAD CRIMINAL/s.
as for those "matatapang" kc may baril; a wise man once said " an armed society is a polite society".
Add a comment...permanent gun ban is not the answer to increasing criminality here in the philippines. with increasing population, our armed forces (PNP/AFP) cannot protect us all. this is a fact. as law-abiding citizens, we should not be banned for carrying legal/registered firearms for self-preservation and protect our families and properties against criminals.
If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.