If you're going to publish the names, you have to do it for ALL offenders, including minors under the age of 18 who still drink and drive.
Diane Dear - 5 years ago
Yes their names should be published. Public humiliation just might stop these irresponsible people from killing innocent victims. There seems to be little consequences.
Robert - 5 years ago
It should say convicted, not accused.
Karen - 5 years ago
And we know the London police force is made up of exemplary members, outstanding members of society who have never laid a single wrongful charge against others... right? /S
No thanks
Jeff D - 5 years ago
TIL 30% of LFP readers have duis
why the hell else would you be against that? Protecting these pieces of garbage is not something they deserve
If you're going to publish the names, you have to do it for ALL offenders, including minors under the age of 18 who still drink and drive.
Yes their names should be published. Public humiliation just might stop these irresponsible people from killing innocent victims. There seems to be little consequences.
It should say convicted, not accused.
And we know the London police force is made up of exemplary members, outstanding members of society who have never laid a single wrongful charge against others... right? /S
No thanks
TIL 30% of LFP readers have duis
why the hell else would you be against that? Protecting these pieces of garbage is not something they deserve