Would Steam Dropping Ubuntu Support Make You Switch Distro? (Poll Closed)

  • The World Famous "No Opinion Yet I Demand a Vote" Option™
    6%
    300 votes

     
  • No, I would continue to use Ubuntu
    24%
    1,204 votes

     
  • Possibly, I certainly consider switching
    23%
    1,170 votes

     
  • Yes, I would switch distro for Steam
    47%
    2,356 votes

     

Poll posted 4 months ago.

Create your own.

Opinions! We all have them. Find out what people really think with polls and surveys from Crowdsignal.com

34 Comments

  • Daniel - 3 months ago

    I use Arch btw

  • Ed Tomlinson - 3 months ago

    I use steam on Linux - Arch Linux. Gave up on Ubuntu years ago... Your poll is missing an option.

  • Zac - 3 months ago

    I used to use Ubuntu when I first switched to Linux, it was good until I wanted to do more than the basics. I now use fedora on all my PCs except one that still runs Windows. It runs great and is amazingly simple to install anything, even software not made for fedora.

  • Christopher Naayen - 3 months ago

    Seems like a real dumb move for Ubuntu more than just steam uses 32 bit

  • MNabil - 3 months ago

    Debian family is heavier and slower than elephants in all directions, I dumped Ubuntu for Arch Linux 3 years now.

  • madsage - 3 months ago

    I understand Canonical is pushing into the Enterprise Cloud.
    I wish them much luck. Very worthy and I know they will do well.
    That being said, I hope this poll changes the decision. Its also a great desktop.
    Don't abandoned your loyal userbase as you prosper. That will be a mistake.

  • I finally ditched a drug called "Ubuntu" - 3 months ago

    Canonical's list of mistakes:
    1) Adding Amazon link to the dock
    2) Switching to GNOME and killing Unity
    3) Removing desktop icons
    4) Caring more about servers and IoT stuff than the desktop itself.
    5) Becoming closer to Microsoft
    6) Adding telemetry stuff
    7) Forcing people to use snap and installing snaps as default
    8) Making specific packages to become older as an excuse of "package freezing" in the repo to force people opt in for snaps.
    9) Giving up on Ubuntu Touch
    10) Giving up on the convergence
    11) And now, removing 32-bit support...
    9)

  • Ryan - 3 months ago

    Is it too hard to keep the 32 bit libs on a 64-bit system? Windows do it even for 16 bit. They still supports 32-bit even though you are using a 64 bit version. I bet this will make more people switch back to Windows, or move up to another distribution.
    Ubuntu... You're digging your own grave.

  • Once upon a time Ubuntu... - 3 months ago

    This is a really BIG reason for people moving away from Ubuntu.
    If nothing changes...
    Well, good look Ubuntu... You will decease and lose the current "standard" status.
    What are the alternatives? Solus, Manjaro, Debian Unstable and openSUSE.
    I can assume they care more about the user than Ubuntu.

  • Louis Hartler. - 3 months ago

    I do not care so much for 32-bit based distributions, but I care about 32-bit libs. A lot of games, programs still depends on 32-bit to work. Wine, Steam and Proton have been affect by this.
    I will switch to Arch Linux if necessary. It will be good for me. Ubuntu was making me become newbie and lazy about learning more complex stuff. I do not care how hard will be, I want to switch. I can't stand Ubuntu anymore. Their decisions are making me puke, are making me feel uncomfortable. Linux is not just Ubuntu crap. Linux is bigger than Ubuntu. Ubuntu was always that overrated sh*t like Windows. Time to change. Time to move way from this. New doors are opening for us to wake up.

  • Wuller - 3 months ago

    Thanks God I've already switched to another distro that respect me as I am, do not force snap on me as a magic alternative and cares for the desktop users.

  • Kurt Ergen - 3 months ago

    I'm currently using Linux Mint, an Ubuntu based distro, and if Linux Mint doesn't independently continue to support 32bit /Steam, then yes, 100% I'm switching. Gaming compatibly is a huge part of why I'm on an Ubuntu based distro to begin with. I'm not sure what distro I'll switch to but, I know Steam OS runs on Debian so, I'm thinking the Debian version of Linux Mint but I'll wait to see what distro Steam suggests first before I commit. Hopefully Conical rethinks this one and backtracks

  • Kelvin Miller - 3 months ago

    I would definitely switch. I've used Linux as my primary desktop OS for over 20 years. Gaming has ALWAYS been important to me. If Ubuntu stops providing 32 bit libraries and Valve stops supporting Ubuntu, I will definitely stop using Ubuntu based distributions. With the recent advancements in gaming on Linux with Valve's Proton and DXVK, this is perhaps the dumbest decision made by a distribution team since Linux Mint decided to drop KDE (and GNOME 3) support. What the hell is Canonical thinking?

  • Qtpierce - 3 months ago

    Yes. I also switch if Ubuntu natively no longer supports eepc netbooks which were atoms with 32 bit CPUs.

  • Paul Quirk - 3 months ago

    I chose Ubuntu specifically because it's easy to get things like Steam to run on it. It's the Linux distro for the masses, so not having Steam would make me switch once my 18.04 LTS is no longer relevant.

  • Isak Ahlberg - 3 months ago

    I'd still use Ubuntu as I don't use it on my primary pc that I game on rather I run Ubuntu for servers

  • Nikolai - 3 months ago

    I use Ubuntu and really like it and have no desire to switch to another distro. I already can't play some games on linux because of it being linux (Proton does not always work). If I can't play any games while at the same time I'm limited (just like it's limited in the other distros) I might as well just use a copy of windows and use that for my games while I use Ubuntu for everything else I do on my computer.

  • Oscar Rivera - 3 months ago

    I began using Linux about a decade ago and I've witnessed gaming on Linux improve over the years thanx to Steam. From a gamers point of view, if Steam goes, I follow. Who knows? Maybe this will make Steam go back to drawing board and improve their SteamOS which hasn't seen an update in ages.

  • Daniel Musial - 3 months ago

    This effects so much more than just steam. It's losing support of software 30years+. Millions of Linux software and will cause devs to drop support in protest.

  • Niels - 3 months ago

    Linux gaming is just growing and I hope to see more of it on Ubuntu. So why screw this up?

  • Tres - 3 months ago

    Better poll is to switch for 32-bit support. Steam's announcement is the symptom. Many other things are affected: office productivity, games, music production, cross-compiling

  • Mark Masloski - 3 months ago

    I was going to move one of my laptops to Ubuntu.... I have used Ubuntu desktop quite a bit in the past. I will certainly find a different distro that I can run steam on.

  • John - 3 months ago

    I'd just make a Docker container with a reasonable distro and Steam client.

  • DannMemer - 3 months ago

    I really think this might have been a gamble too see if canonical could make other companies like valve change from 32bit to 64bit, obviously they couldn't and now might lose a portion of their userbase. Nevertheless, they might make other distros follow thus probably forcing valve to come up with some solution. Hopefully that solution won't be a half-assed hack, but rather something that can help everyone move to 64bit.

  • DannMemer - 3 months ago

    I really think this might have been a gamble too see if canonical could make other companies like valve change from 32bit to 64bit, obviously they couldn't and now might lose a portion of their userbase. Nevertheless, they might make other distros follow thus probably forcing valve to come up with some solution. Hopefully that solution won't be a half-assed hack, but rather something that can help everyone move to 64bit.

  • DannMemer - 3 months ago

    I really think this might have been a gamble too see if canonical could make other companies like valve change from 32bit to 64bit, obviously they couldn't and now might lose a portion of their userbase. Nevertheless, they might make other distros follow thus probably forcing valve to come up with some solution. Hopefully that solution won't be a half-assed hack, but rather something that can help everyone move to 64bit.

  • DannMemer - 3 months ago

    I really think this might have been a gamble too see if canonical could make other companies like valve change from 32bit to 64bit, obviously they couldn't and now might lose a portion of their userbase. Nevertheless, they might make other distros follow thus probably forcing valve to come up with some solution. Hopefully that solution won't be a half-assed hack, but rather something that can help everyone move to 64bit.

  • Justin - 3 months ago

    Looks like time to go back to Windows

  • Peter Cruckshank - 3 months ago

    Doesn't matter to me. But if I was going to switch over it I might try ClearOS

  • Jack - 3 months ago

    Switched already. As soon as that was announced.

  • Jon - 3 months ago

    Not good.

  • Timothy Osborn - 3 months ago

    I am relatively new to the Linux OS and I don't have any commitment to any particular OS but full steam compatibility is incredibly important to me as a user switching from Windows. I don't want the hundreds of dollars I've spent on steam to go to waist.

  • Matthew Martin Ouille - 3 months ago

    This was a really short sighted decision and regardless of the outcome drops the confidence I have in Canonical to deliver and develop a product that accurately reflects the needs and wants of it's users.

  • Leslie - 3 months ago

    The issue is 32 bit support and ubuntu, as i understand it, and there are many way’s around that.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment