Was Mary de Haas right to refuse to name her sources during parliamentary testimony?

No - her refusal undermined the credibility of her claims and frustrated parliamentary oversight. 47% (71 votes)
Yes - she had a duty to protect her sources even if it made her testimony less verifiable. 25% (38 votes)
Partly - her concerns for safety are valid but she should have worked out a compromise. 21% (32 votes)
Not sure - I don’t know enough about her evidence or the risks she cited. 7% (10 votes)

Total Votes: 151

Give others the chance to vote.