Crowdsignal Logo

What explains the gap between a $2,700 procedure and an arbitrator awarding the provider $333,000? (Poll Closed)

  •  
     
  •  
     
  •  
     
  •  
     
Total Votes: 184
6 Comments

  • Cosmos - 4 months ago

    What I don't understand is why the arbitrator can't compromise and/or find a reasonable price between these two extremes. Isn't it their job to uncover the true cost and value of the procedure and arrange payment accordingly?

  • Todd - 4 months ago

    The NYT article dated 4/22 exposes the underbelly of this aspect of the law, with providers chasing massive revenue enhancements for the seemingly shady Breast Reduction surgeries (arbitration requests of 1,000 procedures quarterly??? 15 procedures per day that meet the test for arbitration?). I hope states attorney's general are paying attention and Congress / CMS tighten up this process. You left off A, B and C as a choice...what a mess...

  • jbossy - 4 months ago

    What is the specific context for this poll? Very vague, hard to answer.

  • Joan - 4 months ago

    The system is flawed and unjust. It invites exploration by all actors.

  • CJK - 4 months ago

    It really could have been any one of them…

  • bob - 4 months ago

    the wheel of healthcare calculus

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment