The AFN leader wants the Indian Act gone by 2015, to be replaced by "a ministry of First Nations-Crown relations" and a "treaty rights tribunal." Do you agree?
Yes, absolutely: anything's better than that archaic, racist piece of legislation.
Yes, but only on a timetable that isn't so crazy fast.
Maybe, if I knew more about what AFN suggests would replace the Act.
No: First Nations are too locked into the Act to change now.
No: AFN's alternatives only sound like a new form of the same-old bureaucracy.
See this poll on:
Created at Crowdsignal.com