RSA tokens - what's the right action? (Poll Closed) (poll 5119694)

RSA tokens - what's the right action? (Poll Closed)

RSA should replace all its tokens for all its customers. This would solve the problem. 57% (251 votes)
RSA should replace tokens for its most important customers. This would solve the problem. 2% (9 votes)
RSA needn't bother replacing its tokens. There would be no reason to trust the replacements. 24% (107 votes)
This is a storm in a teacup. The average token user is still much safer, even with a possibly compromised token, than without. 17% (76 votes)

Total Votes: 443

See this poll on: https://poll.fm/5119694/embed

bob beeman - 13 years ago

I Echo Rogers' sentiment. Give us a reason to trust them, and act accordingly. If the original tokens are not comprimised, prove it. if they are, fix it & issue new ones. This is all that RSA can do. Customer options are as Rich D Said.
Rich D - 13 years ago

Inane.

Two factor authentication "RSA style" is still centralized. Control the server code, you control the access.

Decentralized two factor is available today, and its cheaper than RSA.

Use the TPM chips that are already in 500 million PC's! Just activate them and create a TNC environment.

TCG.ORG
WAVE.COM
WAVXDD.COM
Roger - 13 years ago

The option missing is that RSA should be forthright about whether the seeds have been compromised so those using the RSA Securid tokens can know if they are exposed to additional risk or not.