Is it better to make great albums but suck live, or to be great live but put out sucky albums? (poll 5451869)

Is it better to make great albums but suck live, or to be great live but put out sucky albums?

It's more important to release great albums -- I'm willing to forgive not being able to pull it off in concert.

Music was meant to be experienced live! Who cares if the band can't make the albums to match the ferocity of their concerts?

Both are equally important, and, therefore, being bad at either is equally unacceptable.

Vote View Results

See this poll on: https://poll.fm/5451869/embed