What do you think about Peer Review of Science Research?
It's vital for quality control and this justifies the cost of journal subscriptions
It's vital for quality control, but doesn't justify the cost of journal subscriptions
It's not really an effective way of achieving quality control, and should be replaced by something different
It's a complete waste of time: quality is better assessed by citation impact or community reviewing
I don't know
See this poll on:
Leave a Comment
Please enter your name.
Please enter your email address.
Your Website (optional)
Please enter a comment.
Created with the