no, the government did not underestimate the dangers; it simply pretended that the dangers were less.
no reasonable person would have expected the dangers to be less for those troops who were remaining there.
any reasonable person should not have underestimated the resolve and the power of the taliban.
question: at what point does safeguarding become encagement (again)?
Leave a Comment
Give others the chance to vote.
Share this poll, because the more votes the better.
no, the government did not underestimate the dangers; it simply pretended that the dangers were less.
no reasonable person would have expected the dangers to be less for those troops who were remaining there.
any reasonable person should not have underestimated the resolve and the power of the taliban.
question: at what point does safeguarding become encagement (again)?