Public opinion on experience with CA appeal courts.
The opinion that was generated did not acurately address the law in your case.
The opinion that was generated did accurately address the law in your case.
The opinion mirrored the opinion of the attorney representing the other party.
The opinion represented the opinion of the pro per representative.
The opinion reflected evidence that was not presented by either party.
The opinion was correctly based on the legislative requirements of the prevailing law in your case.
The opinion was not correctly based on the legislative requirements of the prevailing law in your case
The time from the initial notice of appeal to opinion exceeded more than 12 months.
The time from notice of appeal to opinion did not exceed more than 12 months.
The length of a custody appeal exceeded 12 months.
The length of a restraining order appeal exceeded 12 month.
The opportunity to present oral argument was helpful to address any mistakes in the opinion.
The opportunity to present oral argument was not helpful to address any mistakes in the opinion
The appeal court did not address any mistakes in its opinion with a petition for rehearing.
The appeal court addressed mistakes in its opinion with a petition for rehearing.
The appeal court did not recall the remittitur with a motion to recall the remittitur.
The appeal court recalled the remittitur with a motion to recall the remittitur.
The Court of appeal reversed the trial court decision.
The Court of appeal did not reverse the trial court decision.
Other:
Vote
See this poll on:
https://poll.fm/7302868/embed
Leave a Comment
Your Name
Please enter your name.
Email Address
Please enter your email address.
Your Website (optional)
Your Comment
Please enter a comment.
0
/4000 chars
Submit Comment
Leave a Comment