The no-pay policy is traditional, but shouldn't be binding going forward. However, wouldn't the pay be considered to be an indirect payment to someone who voted for the President? Couldn't it also be considered to be funding of future campaign contributions to a first term President and their political party? Think about it.
frank - 11 years ago
If they started paying them, wouldn't that make them prostitutes?
The no-pay policy is traditional, but shouldn't be binding going forward. However, wouldn't the pay be considered to be an indirect payment to someone who voted for the President? Couldn't it also be considered to be funding of future campaign contributions to a first term President and their political party? Think about it.
If they started paying them, wouldn't that make them prostitutes?