Negative View of Post-Pub Review: Why? (Poll Closed)

  • Very Little Accountability
    6%

     
  • Generally Too Negative With "Gotcha" Mentality
    66%

     
  • Frequent Commenter Anonymity Makes Dialogue Difficult
    16%

     
  • Strays From Constructive Issues
    6%

     
  • Unnecessary As Traditional Pre-Pub Review Generally Works
    3%

     
  • Other
    4%

     
Poll posted 5 years ago.

Create your own.

Opinions! We all have them. Find out what people really think with polls and surveys from Crowdsignal.com

1 Comment

  • Dave Fernig - 5 years ago

    The main problem is that many authors do not engage. This has nothing to do with anonymity or any of the negative views in this section of the poll: a lack of response is seem for both anonymous and named comments on PubPeer, for comments at PubMed and comments at PLOS journal sites. For me, this demonstrates that many corresponding authors have singularly failed to grasp what science is and how it works.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment