Should Justice Thomas have put the story of Warrick Dunn in his opinion?

Yes, because it's relevant to the question of what should happen to Brumfeld. 26% (72 votes)
Yes, because it's good to include even irrelevant material about the impact of a crime on victims. 13% (36 votes)
No, a judge does best when he strictly limits his opinion to what is relevant to the legal analysis and this is not. 12% (32 votes)
No, because it's confusing to imply that the success of the victim's family has a bearing on anything and insensitive to survivors who fare badly. 6% (16 votes)
It's up to Thomas. He should express himself in a way that seems fit to him. 43% (117 votes)

Total Votes: 273

See this poll on: https://poll.fm/8940069/embed

Give others the chance to vote.