Would you pay more for an LTE-equipped Apple Watch?

4 Comments

  • AL - 8 years ago

    I always believed LTE would complement the Apple Watch's value. I am all for it.

  • Chris Pilgrims - 8 years ago

    Ok here's the deal guys. I voted no, because the price point is just right to include LTE. The current price should stay as it, as it already too high for what's being offered. Too charge more would be unnecessary. Most people voted no I assume for this reason. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THEY DO NOT WANT LTE. I'm sure they do, but they don't want to be charge more that what is already being charged as a pricey smart watch. That being said if it came down to having LTE or not having it, based on manufacturing cost: It's better to have that not have it.

  • Pancho Guevara - 8 years ago

    If apple sold me shit I'd still buy it. Walk around the US and who is NOT using an iPhone

  • Tom - 8 years ago

    I'd pay more for more meaningful health information: constant blood pressure monitoring, constant heart rate monitoring, constant and non-invasive blood sugar levels, cholesterol levels, lipid levels, hormones and a host of other metrics that can be gotten from the blood. THAT is the only way Apple is going to get me to upgrade to a new watch too. It's far too useless to be on an upgrade cycle otherwise.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment