I voted "no" and actually was surprised to see the "no" votes outnumbering the "yes" votes by a margin of 4%. But my reasoning for casting a no vote in this case is because I would be fearful of a "nuclear disaster" that could destroy whole cities in a single bound. After all, hydrogen bombs and hydrogen-powered trucks are the same thing, no? So, for instance, I get in a roll-over accident in Los Angeles from taking a curve too fast, or I slam into a 10-foot clearance in New York because I'm not paying attention to road signs, and next thing you know -- KABOOM!! Then suddenly 15-million people are instantly wiped off the face of the earth in a hydrogen bomb explosion...
I voted "no" and actually was surprised to see the "no" votes outnumbering the "yes" votes by a margin of 4%. But my reasoning for casting a no vote in this case is because I would be fearful of a "nuclear disaster" that could destroy whole cities in a single bound. After all, hydrogen bombs and hydrogen-powered trucks are the same thing, no? So, for instance, I get in a roll-over accident in Los Angeles from taking a curve too fast, or I slam into a 10-foot clearance in New York because I'm not paying attention to road signs, and next thing you know -- KABOOM!! Then suddenly 15-million people are instantly wiped off the face of the earth in a hydrogen bomb explosion...