Was Mary de Haas right to refuse to name her sources during parliamentary testimony?
Yes - she had a duty to protect her sources even if it made her testimony less verifiable.
No - her refusal undermined the credibility of her claims and frustrated parliamentary oversight.
Partly - her concerns for safety are valid but she should have worked out a compromise.
Not sure - I don’t know enough about her evidence or the risks she cited.
Vote
View Results
